Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /usr/home/vcfa/public_html/visualark.vcfa.edu/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-shortcodes/slideshow_layerslider/slideshow_layerslider.php on line 28

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/vcfa/public_html/visualark.vcfa.edu/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-shortcodes/slideshow_layerslider/slideshow_layerslider.php:28) in /usr/home/vcfa/public_html/visualark.vcfa.edu/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Search Results for “feed” – Visual Ark https://visualark.vcfa.edu The VCFA MFA in Visual Art Program Blog Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:18:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Duets – Jessica Oleksy (S 23) and Ghazaleh Avarzamani https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2022/02/17/duets-jessica-oleksy-s-23-and-ghazaleh-avarzamani/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=duets-jessica-oleksy-s-23-and-ghazaleh-avarzamani Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:07:15 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=4169

Duets: student and artist-mentor exchanges

One of the two main components of a student’s course of study in the MFA-VA program at Vermont College of Fine Arts is a semester-long studio project in which the student develops and/or challenges specific aspects of their art practice under the guidance of an Artist-Mentor.

The VCFA Artist-Mentor network is comprised of prominent contemporary artists who mentor students individually, during the semester. With over 1500 Artist-Mentors across the United States and Canada, VCFA students are ensured mentorship with a different Artist-Mentor each semester.

Student: Jessica Oleksy (S 23)

Artist-Mentor: Ghazaleh Avarzamani

Ed. note: The following interview was conducted in December 2021 during Jessica’s 1st semester in the VA Program.

Studio and VC Project TitleExploration of Borders: Allocentric Enculturation of Ecological Systems

My original Visual Culture research was based on the U.S./Mexico border in relation to immigration issues but then transitioned to identity in relation to the border. How is our identity defined by the place we live? Since I felt that I could not speak from my own perspective without really knowing who I am as an artist specifically, I incorporated a plant’s visual perspective of what a border looks like. By doing so the work became instantly more relatable to the average viewer vs. the projects I was working on prior to my first meeting with my Artist-Mentor.

Ghazaleh Avarzamani (born in 1979, Tehran; lives in Toronto, Canada) is a multidisciplinary artist with focus on dominant power structures; By considering a range of spaces and methodologies for interactivity and play she explores the opposing ideas about the purpose of education, these considerations include reflections on games and their pre-designed educational purposes. Her work investigates how official historical narratives are constructed, and the hierarchies behind the ‘voice of authority’. In her practice she is creating visual narratives that are a simultaneous deconstruction and reconstruction of time (history) and space (geography).

Avarzamani graduated from the Central Saint Martins in 2013. She has exhibited at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Toronto, ; Aga Khan Museum, Toronto; Vestfossen Kunstlaboratorium Museum, Norway and many more.

Is there a structure to your exchanges?

J: There is a little bit of a structure. We usually start with me presenting what I am currently working on, where I am as far as each project goes. That’s usually where the conversation starts.

G: There is a structure but it’s organic. We started by trying to understand where Jessica is and narrowing down and articulating her thoughts and interests. Jessica has a very encyclopedic mind and she has a lot to say. I was trying to help her create a control system, not from me, but from herself, to prioritize things and understand what she wants to say exactly.

Jessica, how have the conversations with Ghazaleh affected your process and thinking regarding your work?

J: I thought I had planned and was well organized but when I presented at the meetings I realized I sounded disorganized and unprepared. From her perspective, Ghazaleh did not see things the way I was trying to portray them. Her feedback gave me clarification on what I wanted to say and where I wanted to go. That process took months to understand and apply to my thought process. It took months for me to actually implement and start to understand where the process was going.

G: I give this example to Jessica and other students: I want to imagine their works in the context of an exhibition or in front of an audience and ask, does what they are saying and working on make sense? There is always a big gap between the statement and the work itself. We try to eliminate this gap by bringing the statement and the thoughts closer to each other.

Jessica has a very poetic mind and has a lot to say but you don’t really see all that in her work. So, we tried to get closer and see how we can visualize her thoughts.

Can you describe a pivotal exchange or moment that helped shift something for you?

J: I think a pivotal moment for me was when I went from working on several projects to one single big project. That allowed me to focus on one thing rather than work on several projects simultaneously.

G: Tell us a little bit about the other works…

J: I had been working on some other projects before starting with an Artist-Mentor because I wanted to have some studio projects going prior to my first Artist-Mentor meeting. And those works were not representative of what I was trying to say but forcing different thoughts on the viewer – they were aggressive and abrasive.

What prompted the shift?

J: A big part of the shift had to do with me trying to find my identity as an artist. I didn’t have that in place. I’m not saying I have that 100% currently, but I am in a better place at the moment. Eliminating that particular subject matter from my work allowed me to develop myself as an artist and truly understand what I was trying to say. It allowed me to bring what I am trying to say and what I am actually creating, together – to be more cohesive. That was definitely because of Ghazaleh’s intervention and her feedback. She recommended several books and other artists for me to check out during that time.

Which books?

J: Man and His Symbols by Karl Jung and On Photography by Susan Sontag. Those are a couple of the books she recommended during the semester.

G: I think one of Jessica’s biggest achievements, and we worked hard to get there, is that she could develop consistency.

J: Yes.

G: She had a lot of different approaches, different techniques, and different projects. There was no thread between any of them. They were more like interests. She was interested in a topic and she created one or two works and then jumped to another subject.

I was really trying to encourage her to focus on one thing, be consistent and then create a body of work.

Maybe in another semester she can go back and open those files and investigate other subjects. Gradually I think we will be able to see the thread between all these projects.

How have you been challenged this semester?

J: Oh my goodness. How much time do you have? I have been challenged from the very beginning of this semester. I believe the purpose of going to a grad program is to be challenged. I was completely open and ready for the opportunity to allow feedback and to implement that feedback, and to allow change to happen. Before I came into the program, I wasn’t completely open and I didn’t really have a structured approach to my creating at all. It was very unstructured. I really needed a decision making process, to really make a plan and implement it.

The subject matter I’ve chosen is extremely difficult to study: identity in relation to the U.S. and Mexico border. When I started incorporating the Visual Culture Research into the project it added a whole other element that really made me look at my identity as a person. And the studio work was something that challenged my identity as an artist. I was being challenged about who I am both as an artist and person. To be an artist you have to be defiant; you can’t be wishy washy about what you want to say because the things you are saying are important.

What role did Ghazaleh play in challenging you? 

J: There are so many ways she challenged me. I think the hardest thing to understand for me was the process of elimination – eliminating the excess. For me it was extremely tough to let go of the things that weren’t working and to really focus on the things that were working. Overall, I think that’s what I’ve learned throughout this entire semester. I’m still learning how to implement these things in my decision making process.

Working and focusing on the single 5’ x 10’ piece and putting aside the other things I had been working on allowed me to focus too. It allowed me to develop my process and utilize that process on the additional work I did during the rest of the semester.

G: So many times during our sessions we both agreed that our meetings were more like therapy sessions. It was a very personal journey to go through every aspect of her thoughts and personal aspirations. Jessica is not coming from an art background which in a way is a great thing because she was ready to absorb. What helped during this process as Jessica said: she was super open and very flexible. She is the mother of two and has a lot on her plate. However,  every session she had a lot of new works to show and discuss.

I was very concerned with the level of patience in her practice and that’s why seeing her focusing on one project for six months is a big achievement. Eventually, she could focus on one material, one medium and one subject matter and work and work. Through that process she discovered a lot of other things. She went inward and did a lot of investigation into her work. She came a long way and where she is now standing is great. Of course there is a long way to go!

J: Thank you for that.

How has the VCFA Student – Artist-Mentor model informed the way you approach your process?

J: I wouldn’t have made this much progress this rapidly without this type of program. I think a huge benefit is having someone pay attention to what I’m doing, focusing on me. Because when you are in your thoughts it’s very difficult sometimes to get a grasp on how you want to go about approaching something. Having Ghazaleh understand where I was coming from helped me learn how to articulate those ideas, which I’m still learning. I know that throughout the program it’s going to be the same, a continuous learning process. I am grateful I had Ghazaleh as my Artist-Mentor because I do feel she was a really good fit for me for this semester.

What will you take into the next semester from working with Ghazaleh?

J: There are so many things I learned it’s hard to speak to each thing. There are all these layers of decision making and guidance that I received during the semester that I’m going to take with me into the next semester and into my studio practice.

G: It was actually suggested to Jessica to work with me again in the next semester and I really respected the fact that she rejected the idea. I can see that she is excited to work with other artists and bring more challenges to her work.

J: I always thought that my visual culture work would influence my studio work but I think my studio work is actually influencing my visual culture as well. It’s a weird web and interconnectivity of those two experiences. I’m still learning and reading my notes from Ghazaleh. Although we may not be meeting, I am continuing to learn from her as my Artist-Mentor.

Did Ghazaleh help you to think more about how research can exist within your studio practice?

J: We definitely spoke about research and how it is vital to the creative process.

G: In the first half of the semester, our focus was on her methodology and writing her statement, which was very challenging. We were trying to focus on how she could articulate her thoughts. I understand this isn’t an easy process, she had to come back to her statement and update it throughout the semester.

J: At our first meeting I didn’t have that in place, but I was working on it so the next time we met I at least had a starting point. It took me a long time to come up with the statement because it is something I wanted to take with me long-term.

G: For a while she was not making anything – it was all about sticky notes in her studio – a lot of key words she was trying to organize and prioritize and gradually we got those few keywords up on the wall and then she started writing.

J: After I put the keywords on the wall, I eliminated some of them, and utilized what was left to write my artist statement. The whole process is not easy. Being able to talk or write about my artwork is a tremendous improvement for me. I came in without any ability to discuss my art with other people. I’m still learning, but I can at least talk about it and write about it.

What advice would you give a new student who is thinking about selecting an Artist-Mentor?

J: I think making that decision is part of the process. Learning how to go about selecting an Artist-Mentor is part of the whole process of being an artist. I’m pretty much open to anybody but I also understand the program wants someone who is professional and knows what they are talking about.

I started working with Ghazaleh through a referral from one of the faculty. Immediately I was tested, and I’ve had to overcome and work through those challenges. Going forward in selecting an Artist-Mentor, I want somebody who is going to challenge me again.

G: When we started working together, Jess was mainly working on photography and painting. My work, conceptually or in terms of medium, has nothing to do with her practice. I appreciate the curiosity and the courage when students approach someone who has nothing in common with their work. That’s where the challenge starts, and you start going back and thinking about your work conceptually and things evolve.

Is it a challenge for you as an Artist-Mentor as well?

G: It is. When I started with Jessica, I knew she was a painter and I had been a painter for a long time so I knew I could manage that, but also, I was hoping I was going to push her to a new environment – maybe sculpture, maybe installation. But then I realized, through the process of working together, that painting, for now, is really the best medium for her project. I stopped pushing her and we focused on painting.

J: I was grateful that you did because I really wanted to pursue painting. And even though I wanted to paint, I’m glad I was open to other things. I really was grateful for the opportunity to do something I have a passion for and – completely love.

G: Yes, I can see that you were. And surprisingly, although I ditched the idea of pushing her to three dimensional works, I think by the last two sessions of our discussions she intuitively came up with one sculpture piece and it was really exciting. The piece was a continuation of her research and her paintings.

Without me even pushing her, she was just organically following her intuition, so we got to where I was wanting her to go! I’m really excited to see what she is going to do next semester.

Having a mentor is a luxury that most artists, even if you are an established one, will appreciate it to have a win-win situation. As a mentor, I also learn a lot in this process.

J: We are both insanely busy but when we were together, there on the call, you were totally focused, and I was attempting to be focused. I think that calmness – that little bit of a stopping point – where we could revisit what was going on at the time, is what really helped and guided me through the studio this semester.

G: Maybe fifty percent is about art, but a big portion of it is about making relationships and creating a safe space to talk and brainstorm. That relationship is really important. So many times, in between the meeting sessions, we were sharing ideas via emails and a shared google doc.

One of the other things that I really appreciate about Jessica is how she forced herself to engage. I understand that the first few sessions can be traumatizing and talking about yourself or your work might not be comfortable, but she really worked hard on that. And, again, put this in a context of a newcomer in the art world, where every single thing we are discussing is new to her and she has to really go back and digest it all.

J: Thank you – you just made my day. I’m so grateful for Ghazaleh and I’m so grateful for the program. The way it is designed has really worked for me.

]]>
We Cover the Waterfront – Alumnx: Judy Walgren (W 16) https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2022/01/24/we-cover-the-waterfront-alumnx-judy-walgren-w-16/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=we-cover-the-waterfront-alumnx-judy-walgren-w-16 Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:20:28 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=3981

We Cover the Waterfront:

conversations with VA alumnx, faculty and guests

Alumnx Profile: Judy Walgren (W 16)

Judy Walgren is a Pulitzer-prize winning journalist, photo editor and executive producer. Presently, she works and teaches in the Michigan State University’s School of Journalism as the associate director and professor of practice for photojournalism and new media. She lives in Williamston, Michigan.

Previously, Walgren was the director of photography at the San Francisco Chronicle and photography instructor at DeAnza, Foothill and CCSF Community Colleges in the Bay Area, as well as an instructor in the public education program at SFAI. She has also worked on visual staffs at The Dallas Morning News, The Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post.

Her research explores the semiotics found within visual archives and methods to disrupt bigotry by filling in gaps and expanding cultural narratives.

In the Summer of 2022, during her education abroad program in Kenya, Walgren will be working with Everyday Projects and the Everyday Africa photographers .

Can you talk about how the exhibition at MSU, We Are Worth Everything: Survivors as Themselves, came about and your role in the project?

This exhibition came about because of my experiences at VCFA while working on my MFA in Visual Art. Before attending VCFA, I was working as a photojournalist, photo editor and director of photography for large news organizations—operating under the assumption that community-engaged or social practice approaches to my work would go against the ethics of journalism. We were expected to feign objectivity and separation—both of which are impossible given the intimate nature of my work. Now I know, without a doubt, that objectivity is unattainable and that not offering for someone to provide feedback on their image, when at all possible, can also be viewed as unethical—especially because many of the communities I have been so fortunate to engage with are different than the ones I was born into.

My time studying at VCFA gave me the language, history, and theories on which I could base my approaches to my work, such as my desire to work in collaboration with people and communities. Now that I am working in a journalism school, I am really excited to marry my journalism and artistic practices—retaining the notions of journalism ethics such as to do no harm, not creating or “faking” situations or events then portraying them as reality, capturing events as they unfold, not asking people to repeat actions and so on, while drawing on the ethical approaches that were introduced to me while working on my MFA such as collaboration, informed consent, personal interrogation of privilege and power, and the like. So, when I was hired at MSU in the Summer of 2018, I knew that I wanted to work with the Survivors who stood up to the monster that sexually abused them and try using these new approaches.

I started researching visual media coverage of the Survivors online and was confronted by two distinct sets of images: images of traumatized women speaking in a courtroom to the judge and their abuser and images from the ESPN ESPY awards ceremony where many Survivors dressed in formal evening wear stood together on a stage. They had been invited to receive awards for their courage. I wondered what would be the images that fell in-between being visually represented as a traumatized person and on the other hand as a stunningly beautiful, gorgeously dressed beauty? Human beings are so much more complex, and our identities are intersectional, not fixed. There was also this notion of gender that kept emerging, the engenderment of trauma. How could I augment the formidable digital, visual archive of Survivors of sexual violence starting with this specific group? How could I support these courageous beings to portray themselves?

I was put in touch with one of the Survivors who runs the private Survivor Facebook page and she posted about my idea and an invitation for anyone who wanted to participate with my contact information. I subsequently worked with nearly forty people to create portraits together and then thirty images were chosen for the exhibition; We Are Worth Everything: Survivors as Themselves. I share copyright with each of the people I collaborated with because they were as much a part of creating the images as I was and they deserve autonomy over their images. They can circulate their images independent of my approval, however, I must ask them for permission to exhibit and/or publish the images. I put the onus on myself, which is an ongoing and very powerful exercise for me.

What were some of the collaborative features of the project? 

I worked with each Survivor to decide where their photos would be shot, how they wanted to present themselves and then how those things fit into the notion of what they wanted to say through the image. Some wanted to work in our tiny studio, another wanted to work in a garden, and a few chose to work in their childhood bedrooms. Once we decided on the location and the theme, we would shoot a few images, look at them and then shoot some more. Afterwards, together we would choose one or two images that could be displayed and published.

I’m now working with anyone who has survived sexual violence who wants to collaborate. I really think this notion of identity and sexual violence are very intertwined and it also connects with the work that I’ve just done over the course of my career. If there is ever anybody who wants to work on this project with me, I will do it until I cannot hold the camera anymore. When those I collaborate with see their images, they’re always moved in some way, and that moves me deeply, every time.

Where does collaboration fit into your practice as an artist and an educator?

That’s a great question. Collaboration fits into every aspect of my life, really, and it was my time at VCFA that unlocked that realization for me. I have always been attracted to projects that involve some aspect of social justice which require collaborative approaches. Artist and educator xtine burrough, who is also a VCFA program graduate (VA 01) and a full professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, invited me to collaborate with her on a book that we just wrapped up: Art As Social Practice: Technologies For Change. We’ve brought twenty-seven different artists together who use various forms of technology, along with community-engaged work, for an anthology to be published by Routledge Press in 2022. After xtine saw my work at a visual communications conference where I presented the first ten portraits from the Survivor collaboration series, she asked if I would join her on the book project. Of course I said “Yes,” and am eternally grateful to have had the opportunity to work closely with someone who I deeply respect and who inspires me. We co-edited the book, as well as contributed chapters about our socially engaged approaches to our work. xtine is a genius.

As far as education, the pedagogical approach I take with my students is collaborative, peer-oriented and peer-driven. I’m providing a framework that eradicates the notion of “Professor as genius” and positions the students as co-instructors. I am trying very hard, especially right now during this on-going pandemic, to empower them and to show them that they have agency in the world, in their lives, and with their decision-making processes. I feel like our students are going make great strides in our evolution as human beings because of their acute empathy and their experiences with the COVID outbreak and the #metoo and Black Lives Matter movements. I am so thankful they are here.

Do you think artists are necessary to resistance movements?

Early on, before I started at VCFA, I went to lunch with a well-known photojournalism educator, and he told me that if I got an MFA I was going to ruin my career and contaminate my journalistic integrity. He said that I could get a master’s in anything but art. That conversation convinced me that I needed to get that MFA. Visual artists—we are the resistance. We create the work that articulates the need for change and/or illuminates the change that is here. Our work instigates or provokes change; it suggests, shouts, screams about what needs to change.

I think about Wangechi Mutu’s work, Cauleen Smith’s work, Glenn Ligon’s work, LaToya Ruby Frazier’s work, Viet Le’s work, Mike Cloud’s work. Mike Cloud was a visiting artist for one of the residencies and his artist talk blew my mind apart. He had physically taken apart one of Annie Leibovitz‘s books and then put it back together and hung it on a wall. Before VCFA, I had always been very controlled in my thought processes and aware of the journalistic norms that governed my existence. Suddenly, my brain exploded. Viet Le’s guidance did the same thing. His feedback and mentorship shattered multiple ways of knowing for me—some of which I am still grappling with. Faculty members had me read books that deepened my understanding and awareness in ways that I had never really explored. One book, Edward Said’s Out of Place: A Memoir, had a profound impact on me, as did Jack Halberstam’s The Queer Art of Failure.

Because of the incredible artist-mentors and faculty at VCFA, I was finally able to understand why the straightforward photojournalistic pathways, processes and mythologies never really made sense to me. I was able to embrace the feeling of not perfectly fitting in anywhere. And it’s a huge relief to be ok with that reality and to work from that place.

How have your experiences as a student at VCFA shaped your current practice?

As I have noted, the VCFA experience was life changing for me. I remember being at my Grad review with artists Cauleen Smith and Viet Le – and crying the whole way through it. There was so much that I wanted to say, but I was literally overwhelmed by the rush of emotions led by profound gratitude for their guidance and support. For my final project I visualized years of chaos, rage, and grief and what was there in front of me were the realities that had haunted me for decades—and still do, today.

During the MFA exhibition, people attending from the public sought me out to say that they appreciated what I was saying with the work, which was huge for me to hear. There were no captions, no story that was published with the images displayed. The photos were either from my domestic archive, were appropriated, or were borrowed from friends who were photojournalists. None were made from my own camera.

My MFA experience has also deeply affected my pedagogical approaches, especially around the ethics of photojournalism. With my students, I explain that as photojournalists, we can’t recreate events or actions, we can’t make people do things unless we are making portraits and then the process needs to be collaborative and thoughtful. I ask them to think about ethical representation and engagement and what that looks like for both them and for the people they are photographing. I take time to discuss what the emotional impact that their work might have on themselves and on those who view it. None of these subjects were highlighted when I was in school studying to be a photojournalist.

In the first class, every time, we talk about the mythology of objectivity. We discuss implicit bias and how to uncover and identify these biases in ourselves. And I never say that because you come from one culture then you can’t hang out and work with another culture, but I do stress the need to collaborate, to listen, to work together to find our collective truths. We talk about how the act of understanding, even interrogating your privilege, affects the power dynamic present in all interactions. Having the knowledge, the language and the forum to pass these ideas forward to upcoming visual storytellers is truly a gift, and one that I will never take for granted.

What are you listening to, reading, watching, looking at?

Do you have any food or drink obsessions lately?

I am obsessing on finding fresh uni in the middle of Michigan and on whether or not I should quit drinking coffee again…

What three skills do you think are necessary for a human to navigate and participate in the world?

Empathy, Resilience, Reflexivity

]]>
Duets – Nicholas Lima (W 22) and Faith Wilding https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2021/08/30/duets-nicholas-lima-w-22-and-faith-wilding/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=duets-nicholas-lima-w-22-and-faith-wilding Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:03:58 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=3763

Duets: student and artist-mentor exchanges

One of the two main components of a student’s course of study in the MFA-VA program at Vermont College of Fine Arts is a semester-long studio project in which the student develops and/or challenges specific aspects of their art practice under the guidance of an Artist-Mentor.

The VCFA Artist-Mentor network is comprised of prominent contemporary artists who mentor students individually, during the semester. With over 1500 Artist-Mentors across the United States and Canada, VCFA students are ensured mentorship with a different Artist-Mentor each semester.

Student: Nicholas Lima (W 22)

Artist-Mentor: Faith Wilding

Ed. note: The following interview was conducted in April 2021 during Nico’s 3rd semester in the VA Program – he is currently in his 4th semester. Faith Wilding was Nicholas Lima’s 3rd semester artist-mentor. She is part of the founding faculty of the Visual Art Program at VCFA.

Studio Project

Rare Delicacies is the title of last semester’s Studio Project and I explored the theme of composting as an alternative economic system to what we have now. My sculptures were all made of materials which are the byproducts of my food consumption, i.e. char, ash, bone, microbial/fungal prints (basically the part of the meal we discard). Everything was in a state of decay, and I wanted to assemble these volatile remnants of my consumption into a state which imagines new beginnings.  The works are somewhat of a memento mori, pointing at death to open a conversation about what rebirth might look like: death of a forest, animal, or economic system. 

Visual Culture Project (VC)

For the Visual Culture component of my studies, titled Plowman’s Folly, I focused on texts which look at the history and potential futures of environmental degradation through extractive farming. Agribusiness, which is chemically and technologically intensive, is more akin to  mining copper, or assembling automobiles, than what people think of food production. Respect for the vitality of the ecosystem can not be considered if profit is to be maximized. How do we assimilate our food production into a matrix of forests, rivers, and prairies without degrading those natural systems? Composting is one way to produce more food with less land, but many more “zero waste” schemes need to be employed if we are to survive on this planet.

Faith Wilding

(b. Paraguay, 1943, US Resident)

Wilding is a trans–media artist, writer, activist and educator, engaging intersections of feminism with social justice, cyberfeminism, biotechnology, radical pedagogy, eco– feminism.

Education: BA (Comparative Literature), University of Iowa (1968); MFA (Feminist Art),CalArts (1973). Feminist Art Programs at CSU, Fresno; & CalArts, LA. Installation: Womanhouse (1971–72) (see By Our Own Hands (Double XX, 1976).

Teaching: Performance/ Feminist Art/ Critical Studies, SAIC (2002- -2011 ). Graduate Faculty: MFA–VA, Vermont College of Fine Arts,( 1992–present).

Wilding’s practice addresses the recombinant bio–cultural,biotech reproductive war body in 2D, video, digital media, installations, performances. Her retrospective “Fearful Symmetries” (Threewalls, Chicago,2014) traveled to Rhodes College, Memphis (2014), Pasadena Armory Arts, (2015) UHoustonClear Lake (2016), Carnegie Mellon University (2018). See her website for images of her art and some articles.

Museum shows: Fiber: Sculpture; WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution; Sexual Politics; Division of Labor:Women’s Work in Contemporary Art; re–Act Feminism.

Collaborations: Wilding collaborates with subRosa, a cyberfeminist cell of cultural producers using Bio–Art and tactical feminist performance in the public sphere, to explore and critique the intersections of information and biotechnologies in women’s bodies, lives, and work.

Is there a structure to your exchanges?

N: Faith came to my studio and she got to see all my work. Some of my recent work is little sculptures, so I was glad that she could come. She gave me really good feedback. I don’t know if there was a rigid structure to it, but she talked a lot and I listened. I tried to shut up as much as I could because I talk too much. Faith has, I think, some similar interests in the spiritual aspects of natural processes.

F: That’s a very nice way to put it. If I’m working with a student as an artist-mentor, I will always go and see them at least once. I remember very early on, in the 90s when we just began, and I’ve been part of this program since 1992, I had a student who lived in Alaska. I was living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and teaching at Carnegie Mellon at the time and we had mostly phone meetings, and then for the last meeting I flew to Alaska. I stayed with her at her b&b for a week. And we talked about her work every day. We had two or three hours of a chat and it was amazing.

The studio visits are really important. That’s really what artists should be doing anyway, in practice, having people come to their studios so that you can actually see what the work environment is and all of the stuff that you would never show in a show but that is part of your work and part of your process.

It’s a very special kind of thing to be working one on one with a student. I’ve been an art professor for a long time, and it’s a very different process here at VCFA, because we do actually see our students in their homes, often with their families, in their neighborhoods. And I think that is very much part of what this program is about, because it’s not a lot of young people coming to the college. It’s a lot of mature people.

Nico, how have the conversations with Faith affected your thinking and process regarding your work?

N: I wasn’t sure if some of the work was appropriate. I felt like I was making work that felt like sketches to me, or preparatory works, and Faith gave me permission to really experiment and say this is your work, this is your process, you can be really exploratory. And I think she helped give me some language to wrap my brain around to anchor what it is that I’m really searching for.

My work this semester has felt like scientific explorations because I’m using a lot of materials like dead animals and worms. I’m trying to make something special with the things that I’m doing in making compost and the activities of the garden, to raise an understanding that these are not just farm chores, these are really fertility rituals. How, as a species, we take the broken decay of our system and what do we make from it because we can’t have a clean slate to start over.

I think Faith’s conversations with me have helped me to wrap my brain around it. I’m trying to think of a specific thing that you said Faith, it was something like: you’re taking the bones of capitalism and you’re creating some new future with it. That’s been kind of my key phrase for this work.

F: Yes, I think the aspirational is really important. You know I am always quoting William Blake, a self-taught visionary artist, and Nico is tired of Blake.

N: I love Blake. I’ll never get tired of Blake.

F: We all love Blake. Because Blake, dirt poor as he was, worked as a printmaker, and this is another thing that Nico does, he’s actually also a printmaker. Blake was making illuminated manuscripts, but he wanted to make multiples. You don’t really make multiples of illuminated manuscripts and he figured it out. He figured out how to make his books so he could make twenty books at a time. It was super important that it was printed and that it was in multiples. In a way, he was inventing the form that spoke to what his work was about.

I think it’s the same with the work that Nico is doing. Nico gave me a fantastic tour of his garden, which is not a usual garden. It’s not just one bed, it’s all of these different formats of beds and heaps and different plants in different places. It was really creative and incredibly joyous to me. We talked about paradise and about release. The garden, and making the garden, is one of the oldest arts and this image of paradise is what we strive for. This garden, which we were thrown out of, according to the Bible.

These are the kinds of conversations that we get into.

N: It’s the oldest predicament too, because humans are all reshaping the landscape to be more suitable for us. We’re picking and choosing who can be in the garden, who cannot be in the garden. I’m deciding what is a weed and what is a flower. It is fascinating as a topic.

I’ll be stuck on the garden as a topic for the rest of my life.

Could you describe a pivotal moment or exchange that helped shift something for you?

N: This last visit Faith got to see everything set up in a mock exhibition and she got me to start thinking about how to show this stuff. Because a lot of my little maquettes are super fragile, and even the idea of taking them to a space is kind of logistically troublesome. I asked if I should make a bigger, more durable version. And she encouraged me to think it’s okay if the work is fragile. It’s okay if the work doesn’t have a longevity. Part of the idea of the work is its fragility.

Faith gave me the okay to keep working with these crumbling materials, and she encouraged me to take a lot of photographs and record everything because sometimes all you have left to show is the recording. The process is the work, or it can be another facet of the work.

Before this program, I never really had an idea that the process could be the work. I thought I do the process and then I show you the work. Just like, I make the sandwich and then I serve you the sandwich; we don’t have a conversation about the mustard and the pickles. I just show you the finished product. That was how I was wired. Now, because I am really into the experience of the creation, these conversations have me thinking more about how to convey the experience of the creation.

F: We talked about things like giving garden tours because the work has this performative possibility where there could be interaction. That is totally part of thinking about it as art and also thinking about it as, maybe this sounds a little grandiose, but world building. That’s what artists are always trying to do in a certain way, to create something that allows us to see what the wholeness of life and creation could be.

A garden is a very ancient image with Paradise and being thrown out of the garden, being excluded from the garden, and we are at war with nature. I think that’s part of what needs to be thought about in a larger scale. I introduced the term Gesamtkunstwerk to Nico – which he loved. It means the entire artwork – everything is part of it – from your sketches to your mockups, your photos, your tours, your actual garden.

The other thing that we talk about is what other artists have done and how does what you’re trying to do fit into or not fit into the work of other artists from ancient times to now. So that you see yourself, and it’s always helped me as an artist too, as not alone and as part of a very large company. And Blake thought about it this way too, that there’s this company of thinkers and makers and dreamers that you are part of as an artist, as a poet. I think that’s a really important thing to be aware of.

Nico, how are you finding and defining your company?

N:  I’m looking at a lot more sculptors these days. I’ve always just focused on painting and drawing and printmaking. And I’m finding that a lot of the kind of weird, interesting work that makes me think is by artists that are working with found objects.

Faith mentioned one artist, Mark Dion, who makes these giant installations where he works in a spot that’s been disturbed, and he does an excavation. And part of the exhibition is all the materials that he finds and sorts and organizes so it’s like a cabinet of wonders. I wrote a paper about how he constructed this 30’ climate controlled greenhouse around this giant dying spruce tree that became an ecosystem because of all these mosses and plants and bugs that were already growing on the tree. It made me think of our whole agricultural system and having to put in all these chemicals, money, and materials from around the world, rather than trying to build something with the materials that are already present where you are. We make these overly complicated systems.

(Com)PostConsumer Garden TV, Nicholas Lima, 2021


How have you been challenged this semester?

N: It’s a challenge to me when there are not strict parameters in place. The biggest challenge for me has been creating my own parameters. It’s been counterintuitive to me because when I start working on something I usually start with an existing image and then I just kind of freestyle build an image around it, not really thinking that I want to make a work about such and such. Usually I make a work, and then I step back and apply the meaning. That’s kind of too open ended and you could make a work about anything or nothing that way.

Whereas now, I’m really trying to make work based on the research I’m doing about ecology and sustainability of the soil and the food systems and how the capitalist system engages with the natural system. I’m trying to come up with imagery that is both pertinent to the topic I’m thinking about and that really considers the materials, not just because I like the way the material looks or feels, but because the material has its own set of meanings. And I’m doing it in a way that’s not a sterile process. I’m still discovering something in the creation, that’s been the real challenge. And I think I’ve checked all those boxes in one of my pieces this semester and the rest of them, not so much.

So, I have not made a lot of work that I would say – wow that’s amazing work, but I’ve been learning about a lot of things from the work.

F: I think one of the things that we’ve talked about Nico, and that I stress also for myself, is that the work I make is a process. Often, I don’t really know where it’s going to end. And that the process of making itself is the work in a certain sense. When we were talking about your gardens, for example, making those seasonal gardens, going through the season as it changes and you’re harvesting; that’s part of the work in a sense. It’s both performative and visual, and even edible, for the most part.

These are big ideas. How does one make images that are works that inspire people to think that way? I know it’s definitely something that you aspire to. I aspire to that.

I spent my five last days drawing, drawing a big tree that is basically half dead. So many thoughts came to me. I look at these trees, all the time right on my walk, I see these giant oaks and chestnuts that are 100 years old, or more, and I touch them and think, how can I ever draw this? What is the meaning of it? I think the making is the meaning.

N: I think what Faith is getting at, and I’m finding, is that I can’t express what I want to with one mode of creation. I was always so programmed to be in one mode of creation. Whereas now, I’m finding my writing, my sketching, and actually working with the earth, and using worms to make compost, then going back to the reading, making the objects, seems like it’s all one Gesamtkunstwerk.

No one part of it seems to do it any justice. If you saw one of my little constructions, you’d think okay that’s a kind of a weird, post apocalypse Hieronymus Bosch thing. If you see the doodles you think, alright, this guy is a really unorganized scientist who takes poor notes. Then you look at the garden, you’re like okay, he’s a gardener, so what. Putting it all together is the big challenge. I have to go all around this topic and see it from all its different sides.

I have a new respect for the power of language as a medium. Some of the texts I’ve read this semester had a lot of language play. I was reading Donna Haraway, which reminds me of Faith’s brain, this kind of tentacular thinking. This whole semester I was thinking a lot about what the term “nature” means.

Another challenge is always thinking about an audience. Now I’m thinking more about audience as a form of collaborative thinking. How can I engage with more thinkers and people doing their own scholarly work where my work could kind of throw something into their scholarship and their comments could help me understand my work better?

F: I think it helps in our engagement with your work that you’re able to express these thoughts and that you’re able to be honest about what your struggle is: that it’s experimental, and that you’re learning and open to listening and growing.

For me personally, it’s very gratifying. I always look forward to my talks and visits with you Nico. We talk and talk and talk because there is so much to talk about. A lot of us artists have a  kind of lonely life, I’m pretty much by myself all day making work.

N: I feel guilty that I don’t live a lonely life, and I feel like sometimes, well I’m not a real artist because I don’t live the mad artist’s 24 hours a day in my studio life. I have a family that I enjoy hanging out with and I have other aspects of my life that are not necessarily in the art studio. I don’t know that I could make work that meant anything if I didn’t have those other aspects.

There’s a chunk of me that’s an artist, there’s a chunk of me that works in the schools as an educator, and now there’s a gardener in me. I’m even selling some of my produce now and staying in the restaurant business that way. I think it’s all becoming part of my process.

What do you think you’ll take into the next semester from your work with Faith?

N: I’ve messed around with searching for a language of materials that is meaningful to me. I think that I can continue to explore the different questions and aspects of those materials. How do I put those pieces in a conversation with each other? How do I animate the works and how can the public engage with them, participate with them? Faith and I have been brainstorming about that. What I’m thinking about more and more is how I place the works, or how I display the works. I’m thinking more about those sculptural issues that I never really considered before because I never really did much sculpture.

F: I was encouraging Nico to think about the tour he gave me. That is a performative part of the work and I think Nico is very good at speaking and expressing himself. It’s definitely part of your strength Nico.

What advice would you give a new student thinking about selecting an artist-mentor?

N:  I got a sense from the kind of vibes that people gave during presentations and critiques. I know that it’s not really very intellectual advice, but I got really good feelings about Faith just based on our talking during the last residency. We had good, right off the bat chemistry and we kept conversations going throughout. Faith is also part of my guidance committee, so I check in with Faith anyway.

I think a lot of students I’ve spoken to, they look at a person’s CV and think – oh wow, this artist is really a big deal and important, I’ve got to work with them. Faith’s CV is a big deal but that’s not why I felt like I needed to work with her. The main thrust of her work dealt with a lot of the same things that I was thinking about. She’s into this kind of weird, futurist, natural kind of commune living and those are the big ideas I’m interested in.

F: I’m a refugee from commune living.

N: You’re the real deal commune living.

That’s something that is in my thinking and in my research. And so, I thought, well, this person has real knowledge of this. It’s a lot more than what I could get from reading some dead guys from the 1850s. Right?

F: I’m honored that you selected me over those dead guys.

N: Yeah, Marxists are such bummers. I mean, I agree with everything you say but it’s just a bummer. Your ideas, Faith, are fun and they open possibilities.

I would encourage students to work outside of the discipline that they’re coming in with because if we’re getting into this program it means we have some proficiency in some discipline. Coming into this program with very little experience and knowledge outside of my field of painting, I didn’t really feel like I needed to work with any painters. I wasn’t here to learn techniques. I’m here to learn how to think critically.

During my first residency a visiting artist asked me: why do you work on paper, and why do you paint? And that’s stuck with me the whole time. Why do I choose to work on paper? Now I’m really thinking about that. Even though I still paint, I think about why I am choosing this support or this material. What does it have to do with the meaning of this piece? I think the more uncomfortable we get, and the more variety across disciplines we get exposed to, the better. I think that even if we just go back to working in our original medium, we’re going to have much more in our mental toolbox.

How has the VCFA student/artist-mentor model informed the way you approach your process?

N: Well, for one thing, when I’m reaching out to a potential artist-mentor, right away I have to look at myself and be able to describe my process and how it relates potentially to your process. I have to scrutinize myself and critique myself and think about how I can be better working with you.

F: And do you think you’re better now after having worked with me?

N: Yeah, I think so.

F: I know I’m better after having worked with you for a semester. I wouldn’t be teaching if I wasn’t learning. I’ve been at this school for forty years and I have learned so much. I can’t tell you how much I’ve learned.

N: That’s been the most inspiring thing about this program. The teachers and the students are all so excited to learn.

F: It’s very intense. And you know that intensity comes from this desire, this very strong desire that we all have, to figure out the secrets of the universe, or however you want to put it.

N: A faculty member phrased it well about critiques. He said the other students that are listening in and participating in your critique, they’re just as invested in your work as you are because everybody is trying to learn.

F: And we influence each other. That is the great thing about artists when they’re not fighting, and even when they are fighting. They steal from each other, they influence each other. Some of my best ideas come from, as you know, my friend William Blake who’s been dead for a few 100 years. But he lives in my soul and my brain. I always ask myself: what would Blake say? What would he say in a critique?

]]>
Faculty Member Cauleen Smith Interviewed in FEMEXFILMARCHIVE https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/12/19/faculty-member-cauleen-smith-interviewed-in-femexfilmarchive/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=faculty-member-cauleen-smith-interviewed-in-femexfilmarchive Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:46:48 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=1084 Interview by Jazmyn Wright.

Cauleen Smith is an interdisciplinary filmmaker whose work is rooted in a mid-twentieth century experimental film framework. She uses science fiction, third world cinema, and structuralism, to make “things that deploy the tactics of these disciplines while offering a phenomenological experience for spectators and participants.” Her work has shown nationally and internationally, both solo and in group exhibitions. Originally born in southern California, she was raised in Sacramento. She earned her bachelor’s degree from San Francisco State University and her MFA from UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television. Currently, she is faculty at Vermont College of Fine Arts low-residency MFA program.

This interview was conducted via email in November 2017.

Jazmyn Wright: How did you discover your interest in filmmaking? Did you ever want to do anything else?

Cauleen Smith: Filmmaking incorporates every kind of media and performance style and invents a few that are unique to its form. It’s very satisfying to use film to make art. I’ve always been a creative person, but filmmaking was something I stumbled on. I’m glad I did.

JW: Do you describe yourself as a feminist filmmaker? What does feminist filmmaking mean to you?

CS: The word feminist is a loaded term because when white women use the term they sometimes are not considering the conditions and stakes of a feminist identity for women of color or poor women or women with varying abilities. And this prompts a lot of people to avoid the word feminist. I’m fine with the word. It’s just a word. It’s all about action and ethics.

JW: You clearly identify what feminism means to you, I just wanted to clarify whether you had a specific definition for feminist filmmaking? Do you see a difference between a feminist film and other types of films? Do you think a film has to include specific elements to be considered feminist?

CS: Maybe for a set of guidelines check out the Bechdel test? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechdel_test

JW: Would you describe yourself as an experimental filmmaker? How do you define experimental filmmaking?

CS: Yes, experimental filmmaking is a discipline and practice that operates through questions and forms and structures rather than narratives and characters and plot. This is not to say that experimental films don’t have those things, simply to say that in experimental film the narrative, character and plot do not determine the form of the film. Editing, color, materials, and sound become subjects in and of themselves in experimental film.

JW: Where do your ideas for your films come from, for example Crow Requiem?

CS: I think filmmaking is always about engaging with the world around us. The cues to the things that Crow Requiem is pointing to are right there in the film as well as in the films relationship to American history.

JW: You say the “things that “Crow Requiem” is pointing to are right there in the film.” The film is kind of dark. Between the bare trees and the crows and other aspects, the first thing my mind goes to is “Strange Fruit” and lynching in the Jim Crow south, but that might be a little too grim. Can you expound a little more?

CS: Some elements in the film that may not be obvious are the radio still lives which are taken from John Carpenter’s movie The Fog (listed in the credits). The aesthetics of that film spoke directly to the images coming from protests in Ferguson, MO. There is a lot of information to be gleaned from the soundtrack and music as well (also listed in the credits).

JW: What is your filmmaking process? For example, once you had the idea for “Demon Fuzz”, a film I particularly enjoyed for its geometric visuals, how did you go about creating it?

CS: Oh, I just made that for fun as a fan video. I love that band Demon Fuzz and that song is amazing. So it was just fun to use the mirror filter and make something hypnotic and light. I think the mirror filter is overused all the time, so that video is a bit of an indulgence.

JW: In “Triangle Trade” you do not hide the puppeteers. What is the significance? Is it meant to be self-reflexive?

CS: We are using a puppeteering style based on the Bunraku style of puppeteering. Each artist made a puppet that was supposed to represent them. The audience is asked to reckon with the mirroring between the puppet and the operator.

JW: You mention the Bunraku style of puppeteering. As I understand it Bunraku is a 17th century traditional style of Japanese puppet theater. Is there anything else that should be known about it to better understand the piece?

CS: The reason I made them is because I thought that film was a good form for the ideas I was interested in. In order to grapple with the ideas you would have to watch the films with the intent of applying what can be known to what you see. The narrative is not repeated in simple language, three times like in television shows. There is no spoon-feeding. The viewer is assumed to be an active agent.

JW: In a 2011 interview with “BOMB Magazine” you said, “narrative-movie audiences are becoming more passive; they’re refusing to meet images halfway.” Can you expound? What does it mean to meet an image halfway?

CS: I feel that audiences should always be attempting to understand the aesthetic and formal decisions that a filmmaker is using to make meaning. The desire to have everything explained, unambiguous and easily digestible limits the spectator from actually engaging with the ideas in a way that leads to self-examination. I believe that expecting every film image to be explained and clear, well that is more like wanting to consume advertising or propaganda than art. That’s a spectator who wants to be told things and experience pleasure. Sometimes wrestling with ideas is not immediately pleasurable. And often art shows us things about ourselves that we do not like. Advertising and propaganda never do this. Art cannot tell someone what to think, it can offer pathways and ideas for the viewer.

JW: Experimental films can be ambiguous at times. With your last response in mind, when making a film such as “Chronicles Of A Lying Spirit By Kelly Gabron”, do you want your audience to walk away with a specific understanding, or do you want them to interpret it for themselves?

CS: Hopefully both things can happen.

JW: It was enjoyable getting to converse with you and learn more about your work and filmmaking process and thank you again for participating in this interview.

CS: Thank you, and best of luck.

To see more of Cauleen Smith’s work, you can connect to her Vimeo via this link.

jordan release date | Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG “UNC Patent Leather” Obsidian/Blue Chill-White UK

]]>
Alumnus David French “Was/Is” exhibition @ JacksoNewark Gallery https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/11/02/alumnus-david-french-wasis-exhibition-jacksonewark-gallery/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=alumnus-david-french-wasis-exhibition-jacksonewark-gallery Thu, 02 Nov 2017 23:47:39 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=1049 Kristin J. DeAngelis has partnered with JacksoNewark Gallery to curate and present the works artist David French

David French‘s works are fluid gestures, yet frozen in time. But they appear as if it is still occurring. The opening and the show are at JacksoNewark Gallery at 650 Newark Street located inside Urban Consign & Design in Hoboken.

For more information on JacksoNewark Gallery, please feel free to follow on Facebook JacksoNewark Gallery or contact Paul D. Fitzgerald of Urban Consign & Design.

650 Newark Street
Hoboken, New Jersey 07307latest Nike release | Nike Air Max 270

]]>
Visiting Faculty Member Việt Le Selected for NTU Centre for Contemporary Art Singapore Residency Program https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/11/02/visiting-faculty-member-viet-le-selected-for-ntu-centre-for-contemporary-art-singapore-residency-program/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=visiting-faculty-member-viet-le-selected-for-ntu-centre-for-contemporary-art-singapore-residency-program Thu, 02 Nov 2017 23:37:39 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=1043 Residency Programme: April 2018–March 2019

NTU Centre for Contemporary Art Singapore
Gillman Barracks
43 Malan Road
Singapore 109443

T +65 6460 0300
ntuccaevents@ntu.edu.sg

ntu.ccasingapore.org
Facebook / Instagram / Twitter

NTU Centre for Contemporary Art Singapore (NTU CCA Singapore) is pleased to announce the artists for the 5th cycle of its Residencies Programme (April 2018–March 2019):

Julieta Aranda (Mexico), Izat Arif (Malaysia), Adrián Balesca (Ecuador), Ludovica Carbotta (Italy), Kent Chan (Singapore), Sean Connelly (United States), Daniel Hui (Singapore), Takuji Kogo (Japan), Susanne Kriemann (Germany), Phyoe Kyi (Myanmar), Việt Le (United States), Soyo Lee (South Korea), Lim Sokchanlina (Cambodia), John Low (Singapore), Luca Lum (Singapore), Raafat Majzoub (Lebanon), Falke Pisano (Netherlands), Tan Kai Syng (Singapore), Zai Tang (United Kingdom/Singapore), John Torres (Philippines), Wu Tsang (United States), Susie Wong (Singapore), Wu Mali (Taiwan)

In keeping with NTU CCA Singapore’s holistic approach to the cultural histories and the production of knowledge, the Residencies Programme is distinctly research-oriented and supports artists by granting them a concentrated period of time, a studio, and feedback from in-house curators and international Curators-in-Residence to develop their practice without the pressure of production deadlines. Dedicated to established and emerging artists from Singapore and abroad, this studio-based programme values the open-ended nature of artistic research and embraces multiform expressions of creative enquiry.

Artists-in-Residence receive a studio space and a monthly stipend. The programme also fully funds travel costs and accommodation for foreign artists. To facilitate a dynamic dialogue across different geopolitical contexts and to create an always-diverse community, three studios are reserved for Singapore-based artists, two are dedicated to artists from Asia, and the remaining two are allocated to artists from elsewhere in the world.

Artists are invited to apply for the residency through a nomination process. While in past editions, nominators were international curators, for the 5th cycle, the nominators were exclusively artists. The Centre invited former Artists-in-Residence and established artists from all over the world to put forth the names of their fellows who can most benefit from a research-driven residency in the context of Singapore. This peer-to-peer process furthers the presence of the artists themselves at the core of the Residencies Programme, drawing upon the nominating artists’ generosity, insight, and direct knowledge of the most relevant developments in contemporary art practices.

During their stay, lasting three months for international artists and six months for the Singapore-based artists, Artists-in-Residence become active agents of the Centre’s cultural life through public programmes that range from open studios, artist talks, panel discussions, to screenings and performances.

The final participants in the Residencies Programme were selected by a review panel composed of Ute Meta Bauer (Founding Director, NTU CCA Singapore and Professor, School of Art, Design and Media, NTU), Joselina Cruz (Director, Museum of Contemporary Art and Design, De La Salle College, Manila, Philippines), Low Eng Teong (Assistant Chief Executive, Sector Development Group, National Arts Council, Singapore), Shabbir Hussain Mustafa (Senior Curator, National Gallery Singapore), and Wong Chen-Hsi (Assistant Professor, School of Art, Design and Media, NTU).

Reflecting a wide range of methodologies and critical attitudes, the artists’ proposals were reviewed on the basis of their relevance to Climates. Habitats. Environments, the Centre’s overarching research framework for the next three years (2017–19), and/or their interest to explore issues that address the complexity of cultural and colonial histories of the region as well as global geopolitics. Anna Lovecchio, NTU CCA Singapore Curator, Residencies, states: “Against a culture increasingly veered towards production and exposure, the Residencies Programme is committed to the rather idealistic mission to value the process of artistic research over its product. This kind of residency has a great potential: it can be a retreat, a networking platform, and a sounding board for artists to test their ideas and experiment new directions in the development of their practice.”

Since the programme launched four years ago, it has hosted more than 100 artists, curators, writers, and researchers who have significantly contributed to the Centre’s dynamic environment of experimentation and exchange.

 

For more information about the Residencies Programme, visit www.ntu.ccasingapore.org/residencies/.

The Residencies Programme for Singaporean artists is generously supported by a grant from the National Arts Council, Singapore.

NTU CCA Singapore wishes to thank all those who contributed to our 2016 fundraising auction, the proceeds of which went towards the sustainability of this programme.

 

Located in Gillman Barracks, the NTU Centre for Contemporary Art Singapore (NTU CCA Singapore) is a national research centre of Nanyang Technological University and is supported by a grant from the Economic Development Board. The Centre is unique in its threefold constellation of research and academic programmes, international exhibitions, and residencies, positioning itself as a space for critical discourse and diverse forms of knowledge production. The Centre focuses on Spaces of the Curatorial in Singapore, Southeast Asia, and beyond, as well as engages in multi-layered research topics.

Nanyang Technological University Singapore (NTU) is a research-intensive public university in Singapore with colleges of Engineering, Business, Science, and Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences. NTU is ranked 11th globally and placed 1st amongst the world’s best young universities.

affiliate link trace | adidas Yeezy Boost 350

]]>
Faculty Member Cauleen Smith @ Gallery TPW https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/09/01/faculty-member-cauleen-smith-gallery-tpw/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=faculty-member-cauleen-smith-gallery-tpw https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/09/01/faculty-member-cauleen-smith-gallery-tpw/#respond Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:04:51 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=989

Jérôme Havre, Cauleen Smith, and Camille Turner

Triangle Trade

September 14–November 11, 2017
Opening Reception: Thursday, September 14, 7:00–9:00 pm

Gallery TPW is thrilled to announce an upcoming exhibition featuring Jérôme Havre, Cauleen Smith, and Camille Turner, a new commission made possible with the generous support of Partners in Art. Created during a year of cross-border conversation on their specific relationships to land and belonging, Havre, Smith, and Turner have collaborated on a new short film that will premiere at TPW. The film features three puppet avatars—performing the selves of Havre, Smith, and Turner—navigating distinct worlds that at once isolate them and offer them the possibility of transformative connection. As they move through their respective landscapes, Havre, Smith, and Turner’s puppets reflect on blackness as a state of becoming, a mode of experience that reaches simultaneously into multiple futures and histories. The film is accompanied by a new multi-channel CCTV video installation developed by Smith that creates feedback loops of seeing and being seen amid an immersive environment.

Alongside the project, Toronto-based writer Yaniya Lee joins Gallery TPW as a guest curator of public programs for the course of the exhibition. Lee will engage local Black artists and thinkers as a parallel to the ongoing conversations that have prompted Havre, Smith, and Turner’s work.

In addition to the vital support of Partners in Art, this exhibition is made possible with the assistance of the Liaison of Independent Filmmakers of Toronto (LIFT).

Biographies

Jérôme Havre’s practice concentrates on issues of identity, communities, and territories, investigating the political and sociological processes of contemporary life as they relate to nationalism in France and Canada. Havre adopts a multidisciplinary approach in his exploration of these themes and their attending questions; he uses myriad tools and methods to make tangible the conditions of identity within situations of social transformation. Havre completed his studies at l’École Nationale Supérieure des Beaux-Arts (Paris). Since 2001, he has exhibited in Europe, Africa, and North America. Recent shows include “Talking Back, Otherwise,” Jackman Humanities Institute, University of Toronto; “Paradis: La fabrique de l’image,” espace d’art contemporain 14°N 61°W, Martinique; “Land Marks,” Art Gallery of Peterborough, Ontario; “Liminal (Necessity and accident),” The Robert McLaughlin Gallery, Oshawa, ON; “Reiteration,” Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto;  and “Poetry of Geopolitics,” Koffler Gallery, Toronto. He is represented by Galerie Donald Browne (Montréal) and is currently based in Toronto.

Cauleen Smith is an interdisciplinary artist whose work reflects upon the everyday possibilities of the imagination. Operating in multiple materials and arenas, Smith roots her work firmly within the discourse of mid-twentieth-century experimental film. Drawing from structuralism, third-world cinema, and science fiction, she makes things that deploy the tactics of these disciplines while offering a phenomenological experience for spectators and participants. Smith was born in Riverside, California and grew up in Sacramento. She earned a BA in Creative Arts from San Francisco State University and an MFA from the University of California, Los Angeles School of Theater, Film, and Television. Smith is currently based in Chicago; she will join the faculty of the studio-art program of California Institute of the Arts in January 2018. Her films, objects, and installations have been featured in group exhibitions at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago; the Studio Museum in Harlem; the Contemporary Art Museum Houston; the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts; the New Museum, New York; D21, Leipzig; and Decad, Berlin. She has presented solo exhibitions of her films, drawings, and installations at the Center for Contemporary Art and Culture, Portland, Oregon; the Contemporary Arts Center, UC Irvine; the Art Institute of Chicago; The Kitchen, New York; the Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago; and Threewalls, Chicago. Smith is the recipient of several grants and awards, including the Rockefeller Media Arts Award, a Creative Capital Film/Video grant, a Chicago 3Arts Grant, a the Foundation for Contemporary Arts grant, the Artadia Award, and a Rauschenberg Residency. Smith was a 2016 Recipient of a Herb Alpert Awards in the Arts in Film and Video and is the inaugural recipient of the Ellsworth Kelly Award. She was a Whitney Biennial 2017 participant and currently has a solo show at The Art Institute of Chicago. Smith is represented by Corbett vs. Dempsey, Chicago, and Kate Werble, New York.

Born in Jamaica and based in Toronto, Camille Turner is an explorer of race, space, home, and belonging. She is the founder of Outerregion, an afrofuturist performance company. Her interventions, installations, and public engagements combine Afrofuturism and historical research and have been presented throughout Canada and internationally, including at Dak’Art African Contemporary Art Biennale, Dakar Senegal, and the Bamako Biennale in Mali. Miss Canadiana, one of her earliest performance works, challenges perceptions of Canadianness and troubles the unspoken binary of “real Canadian” and “diverse other.” Camille’s most recent works include Wanted, a collaboration with Camal Pirbhai that uses the trope of fashion to transform an archive of newspaper posts by Canadian slave owners into a series of contemporary fashion ads. Her collaboration with Cheryl L’Hirondelle on LandMarks2017, commissioned by Parks Canada and Partners In Art, resulted in Freedom Tours, an alternative Thousand Islands boat tour and a procession honouring Mother Earth at Rouge National Park. Camille has taught at the University of Toronto, Algoma University, and the Toronto School of Art. She is a graduate of Ontario College of Art and Design and York University’s Masters in Environmental Studies program, where she is currently a PhD candidate. Her work has recently been included in More Caught in the Act, edited by Johanna Householder and Tanya Mars, Looking Beyond Borderlines: North America’s Frontier Imagination by Lee Rodney, and Border Cultures by Srimoyee Mitra and Bonnie Devine. camilleturner.com.

Yaniya Lee’s interdisciplinary research draws on the work of Black Studies scholars to question critical reading practices and reconsider Black art histories in Canada. From 2012-2015 she hosted the Art Talks MTL podcast, a series of long-form interviews with art workers in Montreal. In 2016 she programmed “Labour, Land and Body: geographies of de/colonialism” for Vtape’s Curatorial Incubator. Last fall, with members of the 4:3 Collective, she organized the MICE Symposium on Transformative Justice in the Arts. Lee was previously on the editorial advisory committees for C Magazine and FUSE Magazine. She is a founding collective member of MICE Magazine and a new member of the EMILIA-AMALIA working group. This summer, Lee participated in the Banff Research in Culture: Year 2067 residency. She is the 2017-2018 writer-in-residence at Gallery 44 and currently works as the associate editor at Canadian Art Magazine.

170 St Helens Ave Toronto, ON M6H 4A1  |  VISIT  |  T: 416.645.1066  |  info@gallerytpw.ca  |  HOURS: Tues to Sat, 12pm – 5pm

short url link | Women's Nike Superrep

]]>
https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/09/01/faculty-member-cauleen-smith-gallery-tpw/feed/ 0
Three Visual Art Alumni Collaborate in Minneapolis https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/05/20/three-visual-art-alumni-collaborate-in-minneapolis/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=three-visual-art-alumni-collaborate-in-minneapolis https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/05/20/three-visual-art-alumni-collaborate-in-minneapolis/#respond Sat, 20 May 2017 01:51:05 +0000 https://visualark.vcfa.edu/?p=896 Friendship is Magic is a collaborative site-specific installation created by artist friends Clea Felien, Damali Abrams the Glitter Priestess, and Ambivalently Yours. The show explores how the enthusiasm, language and rituals of girl culture can be used to represent ideas of friendship as a radical act of resistance in a political climate that is increasingly promoting xenophobia and separatism. In a world where adults are encouraged to cultivate potentially beneficial business connections instead of friendship, what does it mean to celebrate friendship instead?

For one weekend, the three artists from Minneapolis, Montreal, and New York will gather at Spackle Cat Gallery (Northrup King Building Studio 358, 1500 Jackson St NE, Minneapolis) to create an interdisciplinary alternate world where friendship itself is a form of magic.

HOURS:
Friday, May 19th – 5:00-10:00 p.m.
Saturday, May 20nd – 2:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m.
Sunday, May 21st – Noon-5:00 p.m.

 

  • May 19 – May 21
    May 19 at 5 PM to May 21 at 5 PM EDT
  • Spackle Cat Gallery, Northrup King Building, Studio 358, 1500 Jackson St NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413

Best Sneakers | Men’s shoes

]]>
https://visualark.vcfa.edu/2017/05/20/three-visual-art-alumni-collaborate-in-minneapolis/feed/ 0